Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True on the tough D and SMU is a much better team....but alot of the TO's were unforced, passing into the stands onOriginally posted by KhalidShockedTheWorld:
SMU played great defense - which was the reason for the TOs. A lot of the TOs were forced.
I didn't realize Purvis FT% had sunk that low. Honestly I don't recall any guard ever having that low of a FT% for UConn.Originally posted by the Blades:
not improving..I guess the 51% on FT's at NC St. wasn't a fluke !Purvis is now at 48% and heading towards the Drummond line,
This post was edited on 2/15 9:29 AM by the Blades
Understood Khalid, but did you watch the game?...it's not all in the numbers some of the calls were down right head scratching and horrible. The 4th foul against Brimah was a touch foul which should never everrrr be called at that juncture in the game. We had refs over ruling other refs who were out of position and had no jurisdiction to make that over rule.Originally posted by KhalidShockedTheWorld:
I was looking at the stats and SMU shot 23 FTs whereas UConn shot 20. That is not a huge disparity, quite frankly. The only stat I see where there was a great disparity is shooting. UConn shot 34% for the game and was consistent- under 40% both halves. SMU shot 48% for the game, which is about their season average.