My reading between the lines of this situation is that the NCAA may be responsible for driving the legal fees up on both sides. The gravamen of Ollie's legal argument is that because the NCAA hasn't told UConn what the alleged infractions were, and because UConn then used those unspecified infraction as the ground to terminate Ollie for cause, Ollie was unconstitutionally deprived of the right to defend himself against the just cause termination which severed the $10,000,000.00 to which Ollie was otherwise contractually entitled. UConn, on the other hand, argues that the mere fact that there were infractions on Ollie's watch, regardless of what they were, brought disrepute upon the school and warranted the just cause termination.
The true nature of the violations, when revealed, will tell us whose argument sinks and whose swims, and will enable a more rapid intelligent settlement. However, the NCAA has not yet said what the infractions are and I have no idea what their timetable is for doing so. They may not care that legal expenses go up with each day for Ollie and UConn. Meanwhile Ollie and UConn can only duke it out until that disclosure happens. It's a complete mess. It does help some lawyers get paid and feed their families and educate their kids but doesn't really help bring a rapid closure for the fans.