ADVERTISEMENT

Nice USF Win - the James Bouknight Show.

Crank2

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2020
50
18
8
Crank it Up.
The team played well today. USF hit more than a couple of unlikely 3 pointers to keep it close. Collins played well down the stretch to prevent the blowout, overcoming excellent defense against him by Christian et alia.
James Bouknight. Anybody else thinking, "okay, not tooooo much now, young fella." If Bouknight had played all season like he did in the last 15 minutes, he'd be a one and done. Let's hope that he stays another year. If he puts up 4 or 5 more games of dominant play, he's going to start making some draft boards. Just way too much physical talent to go unnoticed. As one of the announcers said, "he does it from all three levels." He had two threes, a monster dunk, a blow by lay in, a breakaway lay in, and an 8 foot floater in the span of 10 minutes. He had 19 points in 16 minutes. That's about 45 per 40. He's on his own level out there.
I loved the soup to nuts defensive intensity out there. With the exception of Collins late, and some garbage time buckets, our team defense was relentless and stout. Looking forward to watching years and years of tenacious defense. I appreciate an opponent's shot clock violation as much as I do a power block or a dunk.
I generally liked Hurley's sub patterns today. I particularly liked Brendon Adams' input. He seemed more natural than usual driving to the rim and shooting pull up 2s. 10 points, 3 boards, 4 assists in 31 minutes. Very nice production.
Hat tip to Christian Vital, who kept us in the lead while we awaited the return of Bouk in the second half. 24 points, 6 boards (led team), 3 assists. Nice game for our leader


Really looking forward to when I can go to a sports website and find UConn's score listed on the splash page for "top 25" rather than have to scroll down to AAC and then load those scores.
 
Yeah but the concern is why did Bouknight play only 16 minutes? Stupid fouls. How can he possible cover anyone at the NBA level playing bonehead defense like that? His scoring ability is remarkable and he could be a 20 ppg player as soon as next year, but he cannot really be trusted even to stay on the court.

I agree with your comments on Adams' aggressive, much more natural looking drives today. He did not show this earlier in the year when he was mostly dribbling around laterally. Adams is a very good bench player who is clearly much improved.
 
Last edited:
Yeah but the concern is why did Bouknight play only 16 minutes? Stupid fouls. How can he possible cover anyone at the NBA level playing bonehead defense like that? His scoring ability is remarkable and he could be a 20 ppg player as soon as next year, but he cannot really be trusted even to stay on the court.

I agree with your comments on Adams' aggressive, much more natural looking drives today. He did not show this earlier in the year when he was mostly dribbling around laterally. Adams is a very good bench player who is clearly much improved.


I think the G-League is becoming a viable option as is Europe.....He can learn there but i think there are 20 NBA teams that would view him as a first rounder now based on potential alone. He might be a project but one 20 teams or more would gladly take a 1st round pick on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crank2
I think the G-League is becoming a viable option as is Europe.....He can learn there but i think there are 20 NBA teams that would view him as a first rounder now based on potential alone. He might be a project but one 20 teams or more would gladly take a 1st round pick on.
No way he would be a 1st round pick this year. He can't guard anyone at the college level at this point. He is also small for a NBA shooting guard. He has outstanding athleticism but has a long way to go before he could be considered NBA. If he continues to improve he might be able to be in next years draft.
 
Totally agree with Blenner's post, is he even close to the 1st round on any NBA Draft Board right now? He cannot guard at the college level and does not have anything close to an NBA body right now. I think he is a minimum 2 years and maybe 3 years guy. Getting stronger with Sal Alosi and company should be his main focus, along with improving his D and his sometimes sloppy handle. He is smallish for the 2 guard position in the NBA and he is not really a combo guard. The people who are getting excited about his scoring ability forget that this is only one part of what makes a successful player, and there are way more defensive specialists in the NBA than offensive scoring specialists. There is a list a mile long of great college scorers who couldn't make it in the NBA because they could not defend anyone at any position.
 
No way he would be a 1st round pick this year. He can't guard anyone at the college level at this point. He is also small for a NBA shooting guard. He has outstanding athleticism but has a long way to go before he could be considered NBA. If he continues to improve he might be able to be in next years draft.
Yes but . . . the NBA drafts on potential. His potential is massive. I could see a team using a late 1st or 2nd round pick on him to get the rights, and then see what he can do in the G league. It's a lot like investing . . . the greater the potential reward, the greater the risk that can be taken.
Of course, I desperately, selfishly don't want him to go. He's the difference between a Sweet Sixteen and not getting in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dominicfrank
There is a list a mile long of great college scorers who couldn't make it in the NBA because they could not defend anyone at any position.
If he can score 19 points in 15 minutes, they'll find a home for him. Lol. It's about potential. If he plays the last half dozen games like he played yesterday, he'll be in the discussion for 2nd round.
If a guy with little or no D and a 12 year old's body like Steph Curry can get drafted because he shoots lights out, so can Bouk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dominicfrank
Yes but . . . the NBA drafts on potential. His potential is massive.

His offensive potential is massive, but defensively he is likely viewed as someone who is so bad he needs to be hidden. NBA scouts know the score on this as well as anyone. His body is a concern right now. That could change with time if Sal and his team do what they were hired to do and feed the kid and beef him up.
 
If a guy with little or no D and a 12 year old's body like Steph Curry can get drafted because he shoots lights out, so can Bouk.

Curry is the best shooter in NBA history, and his defense is not that bad. He is a floater defensively and likes to play passing lanes.
 
Last edited:
Curry is the best shooter in NBA history, and his defense is not that bad. He is a floater defensively and likes to play passing lanes.
Yes . . . but . . . when he was drafted he was most certainly NOT the best shooter in NBA history. 6'2", 180 pounds, 6'3" wingspan, picked 7th. He was picked on offensive potential alone.

Side note - Curry had really great ups (almost 3 feet) and was surprisingly strong - 10 reps at 185. I'm impressed with those numbers.
 
Assuming Bouknight is back next year- which I think is a very safe assumption, unless he is getting terrible advice- the backcourt next year of Bouknight, Cole, Gaffney and Adams is really quite intriguing. The guys I don't know how they will figure in the plans next year are Sidney Wilson and Josh Carlton. Carlton has had a poor season and his athletic limitations have been exposed. If Polley and Akok had not gotten hurt, he arguably should not be starting right now over Whaley, and next year there will be 2 new bigs.

Regarding Sidney Wilson, Hurley said in the postgame presser that his few minutes showed he was "unplayable", in a game in which Bouk could only go 16 minutes. Wilson and Carlton do not seem to have big future roles on this team.
 
Assuming Bouknight is back next year- which I think is a very safe assumption, unless he is getting terrible advice- the backcourt next year of Bouknight, Cole, Gaffney and Adams is really quite intriguing. The guys I don't know how they will figure in the plans next year are Sidney Wilson and Josh Carlton. Carlton has had a poor season and his athletic limitations have been exposed. If Polley and Akok had not gotten hurt, he arguably should not be starting right now over Whaley, and next year there will be 2 new bigs.

Regarding Sidney Wilson, Hurley said in the postgame presser that his few minutes showed he was "unplayable", in a game in which Bouk could only go 16 minutes. Wilson and Carlton do not seem to have big future roles on this team.
I agree. Our backcourt will be nice. If JBF can give us 15 good minutes a game, we will be solid. Josh is odd in that he seems to have a switch that is not always on. Can't figure him out. If Whaley continues improving, he is going to be an animal. Would love to see him work on his elbow jumper. If he can shoot 50% from 15 feet, he will become a weapon on offense when we have a guy like Bouk breaking down the D and competently passing.
Next year could be very exciting.
This is i
 
Carlton to me hit his ceiling quickly due to athletic limitations. His offensive efficiency is completely negated by any reasonably effective opposing size. Put a competent body 6’10” or bigger in his way and he becomes useless. Whaley has a distinct athletic advantage and while his offensive repertoire isn’t as sophisticated as Carlton’s, he attempts simple and low risk moves and shots, resulting in better efficiency and better shot attempts. Whaley is much better on D due to being a superior athlete and also learning positioning better. Carlton at this point is a much needed frontcourt body, but a body up front is really all that he has been.
 
Carlton to me hit his ceiling quickly due to athletic limitations. His offensive efficiency is completely negated by any reasonably effective opposing size. Put a competent body 6’10” or bigger in his way and he becomes useless. Whaley has a distinct athletic advantage and while his offensive repertoire isn’t as sophisticated as Carlton’s, he attempts simple and low risk moves and shots, resulting in better efficiency and better shot attempts. Whaley is much better on D due to being a superior athlete and also learning positioning better. Carlton at this point is a much needed frontcourt body, but a body up front is really all that he has been.
All probably true. My take on Carlton is that, much like CV, he was asked to do more than that of which he was capable. I credit him for stepping up and working hard, for the most part. To win big, the program needs guys like Carlton. I don't love the critique that we all sometimes give players that amounts to, "this guy isn't good enough to be starting/playing DI" and so on. If each player gives what they can give, and they work hard, I'll support them wholeheartedly. That's really the point to me. Sure, I want to win, but I can't blame the kids for not having enough talent. Lol. That's on the coach, or the previous coach, as may be.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT