From John Silver and Zac Boyer:
for more go to
The UConn Daily and sign up for their newsletter.
On FB: Not Very Good Is Being Polite
The Story: We here at The UConn Daily don't like to dwell on the negative, but we are determined to give you the news. So here goes: UConn has the worst defense, statistically, in the nation. That we know. But it is actually one of the worst in the history of FBS football. The Huskies
need to hold Temple to -163 yards on Saturday to not be the worst defense in yards surrendered.
WHAT!?!: Allow us to take a shower after writing that and maybe another sip of our Irish Coffee. The Huskies will end their 1-10 season on Saturday against Temple -- a team that they used to own in the 2000s -- and are 29-point underdogs. Let that sink in for a moment.
Randy Edsall went years without losing to a MAC team in his first stint at UConn. Now, the Huskies need a semi-miracle to keep it close.
HOW BAD IS THE DEFENSE, REALLY? Really bad. I mean, REALLY BAD. Let's take a look at the numbers:
- 626.6 yards per game would eclipse Kansas' 560.8 yards per game in 2015 as the most "prolific" defense in allowing yards.
- The Huskies' 8.74 yards per play allowed this year is a full yard worse than any defense since 2004. The Huskies are the worst in yards allowed per play since ECU in 2004 and are a full yard-plus worse than Oregon State, which is allowing 7.49 yards a play.
- The Huskies are slated to give up more than 7,000 yards of offense and have given up 73 touchdowns in 11 games.
- Scoring defense is typically the true-tell sign, and UConn is also last in scoring defense giving up an average of 49.8 points per game.
EVERYONE IS UNDER FIRE: UConn wasn't expected to have a great year, but no one foresaw this kind of defensive performance. Edsall has heard calls for his job, and the calls for the scalp of defensive coordinator
Billy Crocker are also loud. The players feel the pressure, too.
Edsall has played the youngest defense in the nation and has said repeatedly that the freshmen aren't ready to play -- as in physically ready. What does that say about the upperclassmen? Many will move on even though there is eligibility remaining. If you can't break the lineup on this defense, when will you ever? How can you run it back on defensive coaching staff without changes? Hard question to ask -- it's coaches' livelihoods -- but it's the coaches, the players, or a combination of both. In a performance-based business, something has to give.
RECRUITING FIX? Edsall has been lamented for his five-year fix, but it is clear that the players recruited to play
Bob Diaco's defense are ill-equipped to play the 3-3-5 employed by Crocker. Diaco's defenses were solid, if not frustrating, in their passiveness, but they never gave up this kind of yardage (to be fair, no one has). He recruited big and tall players who appear too slow for spread offenses. The players have been replaced by freshmen who, on most teams, wouldn't be even playing, let alone starting.
NO IMPROVEMENT? Perhaps the most perplexing aspect is the team hasn't gotten any better on defense. The tackling and reads are poor and the team that was drilled in the season opener against UCF (understandable) gave up 55 points to ECU (not understandable). That lack of marginal improvement in production is concerning.
BACK TO THE 4-3: We think Edsall has seen enough of a 3-3 front. The
Huskies will go forward with a classic 4-3 front from now on. The Huskies need more defensive linemen and will have to find them on the recruiting trail.
LAST THOUGHTS: This is embarrassing. Edsall knows it. The players know it. That said, it is not up to the players and coaching staff to entertain and play along with the national ridicule. UCF went 0-12 in 2015. Teams can turn around with right recruits and coaching. What we would like to see on Saturday is some pride. Perhaps it won't make a difference, but play like you belong on that field.